You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining the diverse spectrum of inversions, complex structural variation, and chromothripsis in the morbid human genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-017-1158-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan L. Collins, Harrison Brand, Claire E. Redin, Carrie Hanscom, Caroline Antolik, Matthew R. Stone, Joseph T. Glessner, Tamara Mason, Giulia Pregno, Naghmeh Dorrani, Giorgia Mandrile, Daniela Giachino, Danielle Perrin, Cole Walsh, Michelle Cipicchio, Maura Costello, Alexei Stortchevoi, Joon-Yong An, Benjamin B. Currall, Catarina M. Seabra, Ashok Ragavendran, Lauren Margolin, Julian A. Martinez-Agosto, Diane Lucente, Brynn Levy, Stephan J. Sanders, Ronald J. Wapner, Fabiola Quintero-Rivera, Wigard Kloosterman, Michael E. Talkowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 51% |
| Scientists | 30 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#774,922
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#510
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,933
of 328,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#15
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.