You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Primary care clinicians’ attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-117 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline HD Jones, Jeremy Howick, Nia W Roberts, Christopher P Price, Carl Heneghan, Annette Plüddemann, Matthew Thompson |
Abstract |
Point-of-care blood tests are becoming increasingly available and could replace current venipuncture and laboratory testing for many commonly used tests. However, at present very few have been implemented in most primary care settings. Understanding the attitudes of primary care clinicians towards these tests may help to identify the barriers and facilitators to their wider adoption. We aimed to systematically review qualitative studies of primary care clinicians' attitudes to point-of-care blood tests. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
India | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 163 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
Researcher | 29 | 17% |
Other | 18 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 35% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
Engineering | 12 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 20% |
Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,529
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,046
of 207,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#26
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.