↓ Skip to main content

Living well with disability: needs, values and competing factors

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Living well with disability: needs, values and competing factors
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzie Mudge, Nicola M Kayes, Verna A Stavric, Alexis S Channon, Paula Kersten, Kathryn M McPherson

Abstract

Obesity is more prevalent for disabled people (estimated as being between 27-62%) compared to the general population (17-22%). Disabled people are more likely to report poorer general health and acquire a range of obesity-related secondary conditions. Although there are many physical activity and nutrition initiatives aimed at obesity prevention, little is known about whether these options are relevant and accessible for disabled people. The Living Well Study aimed to better understand the issues faced by disabled people when engaging in physical activity and healthy eating.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 19%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Librarian 7 4%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Social Sciences 22 13%
Psychology 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 45 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,895
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,499
of 210,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.