↓ Skip to main content

Effects of job rotation and role stress among nurses on job satisfaction and organizational commitment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
684 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of job rotation and role stress among nurses on job satisfaction and organizational commitment
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-9-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Hsien Ho, Ching Sheng Chang, Ying-Ling Shih, Rong-Da Liang

Abstract

The motivation for this study was to investigate how role stress among nurses could affect their job satisfaction and organizational commitment, and whether the job rotation system might encourage nurses to understand, relate to and share the vision of the organization, consequently increasing their job satisfaction and stimulating them to willingly remain in their jobs and commit themselves to the organization. Despite the fact that there have been plenty of studies on job satisfaction, none was specifically addressed to integrate the relational model of job rotation, role stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among nurses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 684 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 667 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 166 24%
Student > Bachelor 114 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 10%
Student > Postgraduate 54 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 5%
Other 111 16%
Unknown 135 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 192 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 9%
Social Sciences 62 9%
Psychology 47 7%
Other 103 15%
Unknown 140 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,867,545
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,722
of 7,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,785
of 173,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.