You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
More harm than good? The questionable ethics of medical volunteering and international student placements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40794-017-0048-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irmgard Bauer |
| Abstract |
It has been argued that much of international medical volunteering is done for the wrong reasons, in that local people serve as a means to meet volunteers' needs, or for the right reasons but ignorance and ill-preparedness harm the intended beneficiaries, often without volunteers' grasp of the damage caused. The literature on ethical concerns in medical volunteering has grown tremendously over the last years highlighting the need for appropriate guidelines. These same concerns, however, and an appreciation of the reasons why current aid paradigms are flawed, can serve as indicators on how to change existing practices to ensure a better outcome for those who are in need of help. Such paradigm change envisages medical assistance in the spirit of solidarity, social justice, equality, and collegial collaboration. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| Australia | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#996,059
of 24,401,594 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
#11
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,938
of 315,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,401,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.