↓ Skip to main content

Obstetric Fistula in Burundi: a comprehensive approach to managing women with this neglected disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obstetric Fistula in Burundi: a comprehensive approach to managing women with this neglected disease
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Tayler-Smith, Rony Zachariah, Marcel Manzi, Wilma van den Boogaard, An Vandeborne, Aristide Bishinga, Eva De Plecker, Vincent Lambert, Bavo Christiaens, Gamaliel Sinabajije, Miguel Trelles, Stephan Goetghebuer, Tony Reid, Anthony Harries

Abstract

In Burundi, the annual incidence of obstetric fistula is estimated to be 0.2-0.5% of all deliveries, with 1000--2000 new cases per year. Despite this relatively high incidence, national capacity for identifying and managing obstetric fistula is very limited. Thus, in July 2010, Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) set up a specialised Obstetric Fistula Centre in Gitega (Gitega Fistula Centre, GFC), the only permanent referral centre for obstetric fistula in Burundi. A comprehensive model of care is offered including psychosocial support, conservative and surgical management, post-operative care and follow-up. We describe this model of care, patient outcomes and the operational challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 26%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Lecturer 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 16%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#13,290,626
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,454
of 4,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,822
of 198,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.