↓ Skip to main content

Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental traumatic brain injury
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-10-106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Run Zhang, Yi Liu, Ke Yan, Lei Chen, Xiang-Rong Chen, Peng Li, Fan-Fan Chen, Xiao-Dan Jiang

Abstract

Previous studies have shown beneficial effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in central nervous system (CNS) injuries, including traumatic brain injury (TBI). Potential repair mechanisms involve transdifferentiation to replace damaged neural cells and production of growth factors by MSCs. However, few studies have simultaneously focused on the effects of MSCs on immune cells and inflammation-associated cytokines in CNS injury, especially in an experimental TBI model. In this study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of MSCs in TBI-induced neuroinflammation by systemic transplantation of MSCs into a rat TBI model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Unknown 201 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 14%
Neuroscience 25 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 53 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,394,617
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,100
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,402
of 199,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.