You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transplantation of human cord blood mononuclear cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in autism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-11-196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong-Tao Lv, Yun Zhang, Min Liu, Jia-na-ti Qiuwaxi, Paul Ashwood, Sungho Charles Cho, Ying Huan, Ru-Cun Ge, Xing-Wang Chen, Zhao-Jing Wang, Byung-Jo Kim, Xiang Hu |
| Abstract |
Autism is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder. At present there are no defined mechanisms of pathogenesis and therapy is mostly limited to behavioral interventions. Stem cell transplantation may offer a unique treatment strategy for autism due to immune and neural dysregulation observed in this disease. This non-randomized, open-label, single center phase I/II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of combined transplantation of human cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMNCs) and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) in treating children with autism. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,077,205
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#216
of 4,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,029
of 212,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.