↓ Skip to main content

Examining the cost effectiveness of interventions to promote the physical health of people with mental health problems: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining the cost effectiveness of interventions to promote the physical health of people with mental health problems: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-787
Pubmed ID
Authors

A-La Park, David McDaid, Prisca Weiser, Carolin Von Gottberg, Thomas Becker, Reinhold Kilian, for the HELPS Network

Abstract

Recently attention has begun to focus not only on assessing the effectiveness of interventions to tackle mental health problems, but also on measures to prevent physical co-morbidity. Individuals with mental health problems are at significantly increased risk of chronic physical health problems, such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes, as well as reduced life expectancy. The excess costs of co-morbid physical and mental health problems are substantial. Potentially, measures to reduce the risk of co-morbid physical health problems may represent excellent value for money.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 312 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 74 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 21%
Psychology 57 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 88 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,694,922
of 24,592,508 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,891
of 16,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,758
of 205,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#39
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,592,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.