↓ Skip to main content

Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Melloh, Christoph Röder, Achim Elfering, Jean-Claude Theis, Urs Müller, Lukas P Staub, Emin Aghayev, Thomas Zweig, Thomas Barz, Thomas Kohlmann, Simon Wieser, Peter Jüni, Marcel Zwahlen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 12 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Psychology 14 9%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,567,186
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,182
of 4,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,694
of 83,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.