↓ Skip to main content

Life cycle evolution: was the eumetazoan ancestor a holopelagic, planktotrophic gastraea?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Life cycle evolution: was the eumetazoan ancestor a holopelagic, planktotrophic gastraea?
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claus Nielsen

Abstract

Two theories for the origin of animal life cycles with planktotrophic larvae are now discussed seriously: The terminal addition theory proposes a holopelagic, planktotrophic gastraea as the ancestor of the eumetazoans with addition of benthic adult stages and retention of the planktotrophic stages as larvae, i.e. the ancestral life cycles were indirect. The intercalation theory now proposes a benthic, deposit-feeding gastraea as the bilaterian ancestor with a direct development, and with planktotrophic larvae evolving independently in numerous lineages through specializations of juveniles.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 115 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,657,802
of 20,243,075 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,268
of 2,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,473
of 177,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,243,075 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them