↓ Skip to main content

Gout impacts on function and health-related quality of life beyond associated risk factors and medical conditions: results from the KING observational study of the Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR…

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gout impacts on function and health-related quality of life beyond associated risk factors and medical conditions: results from the KING observational study of the Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR)
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/ar4281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Alberto Scirè, Maria Manara, Marco Amedeo Cimmino, Marcello Govoni, Fausto Salaffi, Leonardo Punzi, Maria Cristina Monti, Greta Carrara, Carlomaurizio Montecucco, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Giovanni Minisola, KING Study Collaborators

Abstract

Gout is the most prevalent arthritis and significantly impacts on function and quality of life. Given that gout associates with disabling comorbid conditions, it is not clear whether such a complex of diseases accounts for the increased disability or if gout may play a role by itself. This study aims to evaluate the specific influence of gout and disease-related features on functional disability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with gout followed in rheumatology clinics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Unspecified 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,612
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,815
of 208,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#27
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.