↓ Skip to main content

Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of peptide vaccine treatment: based on the results of a phase II study on advanced pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of peptide vaccine treatment: based on the results of a phase II study on advanced pancreatic cancer
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13046-017-0509-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshitaro Shindo, Shoichi Hazama, Nobuaki Suzuki, Haruo Iguchi, Kazuhiro Uesugi, Hiroaki Tanaka, Atsushi Aruga, Takashi Hatori, Hidenobu Ishizaki, Yuzo Umeda, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara, Tetsuya Ikemoto, Mitsuo Shimada, Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu, Hiroko Takenouchi, Hiroto Matsui, Shinsuke Kanekiyo, Michihisa Iida, Yasunobu Koki, Hideki Arima, Hiroyuki Furukawa, Tomio Ueno, Shigefumi Yoshino, Tomonobu Fujita, Yutaka Kawakami, Yusuke Nakamura, Masaaki Oka, Hiroaki Nagano

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to explore novel biomarkers that can predict the clinical outcome of patients before treatment or during vaccination. These would be useful for the selection of appropriate patients who would be expected to exhibit better treatment outcomes from vaccination, and for facilitating the development of cancer vaccine treatments. From a single-arm, non-randomized, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A-status-blind phase II trial of a vaccine treatment using three HLA-A*2402-restricted peptides for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), we obtained peripheral blood samples from 36 patients of an HLA-A*2402-matched group and 27 patients of an HLA-A*2402-unmatched group. Multivariate analysis (HR = 2.546; 95% CI = 1.138 to 5.765; p = 0.0231) and log-rank test (p = 0.0036) showed that a high expression level of programmed death-1 (PD-1) on CD4+ T cells was a negative predictive biomarker of overall survival in the HLA-A*2402-matched group . Moreover, a high expression level of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells was a negative predictor for the induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (p = 0.0007). After treatment, we found that the upregulation of PD-1 and T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (Tim-3) expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was significantly associated with a poor clinical outcome in the HLA-A*2402-matched group (p = 0.0330, 0.0282, 0.0046, and 0.0068, respectively). In contrast, there was no significant difference for these factors in the HLA-A*2402-unmatched group. Our results indicate that the upregulation of PD-1 and Tim-3 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells may restrict T cell responses in advanced PC patients; therefore, combination immunotherapy with blockade of PD-1 and Tim-3 to restore T cell responses may be a potential therapeutic approach for advanced PC patients. Clinical-Trail-Registration: UMIN000008082 .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1,969
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,775
of 324,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.