↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana E Thomas, Elizabeth J Elliott

Abstract

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) may follow infection with Shiga-toxin-producing organisms, principally E. coli O157: H7 (STEC), causing high morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to identify interventions to prevent diarrhea-associated HUS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 45 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,632,302
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,745
of 14,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,041
of 196,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#214
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.