You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Labisia pumila regulates bone-related genes expressions in postmenopausal osteoporosis model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siti Noor Fathilah, Norazlina Mohamed, Norliza Muhammad, Isa Naina Mohamed, Ima Nirwana Soelaiman, Ahmad Nazrun Shuid |
| Abstract |
Labisia Pumila var. alata (LPva) has shown potential as an alternative to estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in prevention of estrogen-deficient osteoporosis. In earlier studies using postmenopausal model, LPva was able to reverse the ovariectomy-induced changes in biochemical markers, bone calcium, bone histomorphometric parameters and biomechanical strength. The mechanism behind these protective effects is unclear but LPva may have regulated factors that regulate bone remodeling. The aim of this study is to determine the bone-protective mechanism of LPva by measuring the expressions of several factors involved in bone formative and resorptive activities namely Osteoprotegerin (OPG), Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor kappa-B Ligand (RANKL), Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor (MCSF) and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,928,728
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,118
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,006
of 196,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#18
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.