You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics Selection Evolution, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12711-017-0301-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hubert Pausch, Iona M. MacLeod, Ruedi Fries, Reiner Emmerling, Phil J. Bowman, Hans D. Daetwyler, Michael E. Goddard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#303
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,582
of 323,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.