↓ Skip to main content

The implementation research institute: training mental health implementation researchers in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The implementation research institute: training mental health implementation researchers in the United States
Published in
Implementation Science, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enola K Proctor, John Landsverk, Ana A Baumann, Brian S Mittman, Gregory A Aarons, Ross C Brownson, Charles Glisson, David Chambers

Abstract

The Implementation Research Institute (IRI) provides two years of training in mental health implementation science for 10 new fellows each year. The IRI is supported by a National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R25 grant and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Fellows attend two annual week-long trainings at Washington University in St. Louis. Training is provided through a rigorous curriculum, local and national mentoring, a 'learning site visit' to a federally funded implementation research project, pilot research, and grant writing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 12 11%
Professor 11 10%
Other 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Psychology 19 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,119,197
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#768
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,553
of 204,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.