↓ Skip to main content

Distribution but not amount of protein intake is associated with frailty: a cross-sectional investigation in the region of Nürnberg

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution but not amount of protein intake is associated with frailty: a cross-sectional investigation in the region of Nürnberg
Published in
Nutrition Journal, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Bollwein, Rebecca Diekmann, Matthias J Kaiser, Jürgen M Bauer, Wolfgang Uter, Cornel C Sieber, Dorothee Volkert

Abstract

To preserve muscle mass and therefore limit the risk of disability in older adults protein intake is seen as important factor. Besides the amount of protein, its distribution over the day is thought to affect protein anabolism. This cross-sectional study investigates the association between the amount and distribution of protein intake and frailty in older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 207 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 14 7%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 13%
Sports and Recreations 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#740,564
of 25,079,481 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#220
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,792
of 203,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.