You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Distribution but not amount of protein intake is associated with frailty: a cross-sectional investigation in the region of Nürnberg
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-109 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia Bollwein, Rebecca Diekmann, Matthias J Kaiser, Jürgen M Bauer, Wolfgang Uter, Cornel C Sieber, Dorothee Volkert |
Abstract |
To preserve muscle mass and therefore limit the risk of disability in older adults protein intake is seen as important factor. Besides the amount of protein, its distribution over the day is thought to affect protein anabolism. This cross-sectional study investigates the association between the amount and distribution of protein intake and frailty in older adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 4 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
New Zealand | 2 | 9% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 207 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
Researcher | 21 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 17% |
Unknown | 49 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 15 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 8% |
Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#740,564
of 25,079,481 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#220
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,792
of 203,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.