↓ Skip to main content

Analysing complex Triticeae genomes – concepts and strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysing complex Triticeae genomes – concepts and strategies
Published in
Plant Methods, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-9-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Spannagl, Mihaela M Martis, Matthias Pfeifer, Thomas Nussbaumer, Klaus FX Mayer

Abstract

The genomic sequences of many important Triticeae crop species are hard to assemble and analyse due to their large genome sizes, (in part) polyploid genomes and high repeat content. Recently, the draft genomes of barley and bread wheat were reported thanks to cost-efficient and fast NGS technologies. The genome of barley is estimated to be 5 Gb in size whereas the genome of bread wheat accounts for 17 Gb and harbours an allo-hexaploid genome. Direct assembly of the sequence reads and access to the gene content is hampered by the repeat content. As a consequence, novel strategies and data analysis concepts had to be developed to provide much-needed whole genome sequence surveys and access to the gene repertoires. Here we describe some analytical strategies that now enable structuring of massive NGS data generated and pave the way towards structured and ordered sequence data and gene order. Specifically we report on the GenomeZipper, a synteny driven approach to order and structure NGS survey sequences of grass genomes that lack a physical map. In addition, to access and analyse the gene repertoire of allo-hexaploid bread wheat from the raw sequence reads, a reference-guided approach was developed utilizing representative genes from rice, Brachypodium distachyon, sorghum and barley. Stringent sub-assembly on the reference genes prevented collapsing of homeologous wheat genes and allowed to estimate gene retention rate and determine gene family sizes. Genomic sequences from the wheat sub-genome progenitors enabled to discriminate a large number of sub-assemblies between the wheat A, B or D sub-genome using machine learning algorithms. Many of the concepts outlined here can readily be applied to other complex plant and non-plant genomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Argentina 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 118 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 7 5%
Student > Master 7 5%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Computer Science 6 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,956,690
of 24,336,902 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#622
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,167
of 201,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,336,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.