↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review investigating fatigue, psychological and cognitive impairment following TIA and minor stroke: protocol paper

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review investigating fatigue, psychological and cognitive impairment following TIA and minor stroke: protocol paper
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace M Moran, Benjamin Fletcher, Melanie Calvert, Max G Feltham, Catherine Sackley, Tom Marshall

Abstract

Approximately 20,000 people have a transient ischemic attack (TIA) and 23,375 have a minor stroke in England each year. Fatigue, psychological and cognitive impairments are well documented post-stroke. Evidence suggests that TIA and minor stroke patients also experience these impairments; however, they are not routinely offered relevant treatment. This systematic review aims to: (1) establish the prevalence of fatigue, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and cognitive impairment following TIA and minor stroke and to investigate the temporal course of these impairments; (2) explore impact on quality of life (QoL), change in emotions and return to work; (3) identify where further research is required and to potentially inform an intervention study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 13%
Researcher 17 10%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 28%
Psychology 33 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 36 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#6,800,543
of 24,930,865 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,251
of 2,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,584
of 203,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#19
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,930,865 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.