You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wild boar tuberculosis in Iberian Atlantic Spain: a different picture from Mediterranean habitats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-6148-9-176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Muñoz-Mendoza, Nelson Marreros, Mariana Boadella, Christian Gortázar, Santiago Menéndez, Lucía de Juan, Javier Bezos, Beatriz Romero, María Francisca Copano, Javier Amado, José Luis Sáez, Jorge Mourelo, Ana Balseiro |
| Abstract |
Infections with Mycobacterium bovis and closely related members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) are shared between livestock, wildlife and sporadically human beings. Wildlife reservoirs exist worldwide and can interfere with bovine tuberculosis (TB) eradication efforts. The Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) is a MTC maintenance host in Mediterranean Iberia (Spain and Portugal). However, few systematic studies in wild boar have been carried out in Atlantic regions. We describe the prevalence, distribution, pathology and epidemiology of MTC and other mycobacteria from wild boar in Atlantic Spain. A total of 2,067 wild boar were sampled between 2008 and 2012. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 27% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 29 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,089,102
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#476
of 3,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,140
of 210,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.