You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The reliability of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicholas Lucas, Petra Macaskill, Les Irwig, Robert Moran, Luke Rickards, Robin Turner, Nikolai Bogduk |
Abstract |
The aim of this project was to investigate the reliability of a new 11-item quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). The tool was tested on studies reporting the reliability of any physical examination procedure. The reliability of physical examination is a challenging area to study given the complex testing procedures, the range of tests, and lack of procedural standardisation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 25% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,279,577
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,502
of 2,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,699
of 197,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.