↓ Skip to main content

Misplaced links in the chain of survival due to an incorrect manual for the emergency call at public facilities

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Misplaced links in the chain of survival due to an incorrect manual for the emergency call at public facilities
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1865-1380-6-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yutaka Takei, Taiki Nishi, Keiko Takase, Takahisa Kamikura, Hideo Inaba

Abstract

The incidence of delayed emergency calls and the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may differ among public facilities when emergency calls are placed by institutional staff. The purpose of this study was to identify the actions prescribed in the rules and/or manuals of public facilities and to clarify whether the incidence of delayed emergency call placement and the outcome of OHCA differ among these facilities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Librarian 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#4,204,439
of 9,723,582 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#157
of 317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,527
of 139,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,723,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.