You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
STI in remote communities: improved and enhanced primary health care (STRIVE) study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing ‘usual practice’ STI care to enhanced care in remote primary health care services in Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-425 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James Ward, Skye McGregor, Rebecca J Guy, Alice R Rumbold, Linda Garton, Bronwyn J Silver, Debbie Taylor-Thomson, Belinda Hengel, Janet Knox, Amalie Dyda, Matthew G Law, Handan Wand, Basil Donovan, Christopher K Fairley, Steven Skov, Donna Ah Chee, John Boffa, David Glance, Robyn McDermott, Lisa Maher, John M Kaldor |
Abstract |
Despite two decades of interventions, rates of sexually transmissible infections (STI) in remote Australian Aboriginal communities remain unacceptably high. Routine notifications data from 2011 indicate rates of chlamydia and gonorrhoea among Aboriginal people in remote settings were 8 and 61 times higher respectively than in the non-Indigenous population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 24% |
Unknown | 35 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 19% |
Unknown | 43 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,261,312
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,917
of 7,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,213
of 197,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#32
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.