↓ Skip to main content

Students' and teachers' perceptions of clinical assessment program: A qualitative study in a PBL curriculum

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Students' and teachers' perceptions of clinical assessment program: A qualitative study in a PBL curriculum
Published in
BMC Research Notes, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-2-263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanan MF Al Kadri, Mohamed S Al-Moamary, Cees van der Vleuten

Abstract

"Examinations drive students' learning." This statement refers to what is assumed to be one of the strongest relationships in education. We explored in this research how and why students differ in their approaches to learning, how assessment affects deep learning, and which barriers stand in the way of good assessment and learning in the clinical years of a Problem Based Learning (PBL) graduate entry medical curriculum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 1 1%
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Professor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 40%
Social Sciences 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,259
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,410
of 172,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.