You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biological constraints limit the use of rapamycin-inducible FKBP12-Inp54p for depleting PIP2 in dorsal root ganglia neurons
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-5751-12-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jaeda C Coutinho-Budd, Samuel B Snider, Brendan J Fitzpatrick, Joseph E Rittiner, Mark J Zylka |
Abstract |
Rapamycin-induced translocation systems can be used to manipulate biological processes with precise temporal control. These systems are based on rapamycin-induced dimerization of FK506 Binding Protein 12 (FKBP12) with the FKBP Rapamycin Binding (FRB) domain of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Here, we sought to adapt a rapamycin-inducible phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2)-specific phosphatase (Inp54p) system to deplete PIP2 in nociceptive dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 28% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 55% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#82
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,145
of 197,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.