↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting immunosurveillance and immunostimulation: Implications for cancer immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisiting immunosurveillance and immunostimulation: Implications for cancer immunotherapy
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2005
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-3-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine V Ichim

Abstract

Experimental and clinical experience demonstrates that the resolution of a pathogenic challenge depends not only on the presence or absence of an immune reaction, but also on the initiation of the proper type of immune reaction. The initiation of a non-protective type of immune reaction will not only result in a lack of protection, but may also exacerbate the underlying condition. For example, in cancer, constituents of the immune system have been shown to augment tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastases. This review discusses the duality of the role of the immune system in cancer, from the theories of immunosurveillance and immunostimulation to current studies, which illustrate that the immune system has both a protective role and a tumor-promoting role in neoplasia. The potential of using chemotherapy to inhibit a tumor-promoting immune reaction is also discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,339,559
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#945
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,855
of 157,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.