↓ Skip to main content

Absence of neurotoxicity with perineural injection of ultrasound gels: assessment using an animal model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Absence of neurotoxicity with perineural injection of ultrasound gels: assessment using an animal model
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-13-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Belavy, Nana Sunn, Queenie Lau, Thomas Robertson

Abstract

Ultrasound gels may contain propylene glycol and glycerol, which are neurotoxic in high concentrations. If the needle passes through gel during regional anesthesia, gel may be injected near the nerve. It is unknown if this practice poses a risk for neurotoxicity. Using an animal model, we assessed the histological changes of perineural propylene glycol on nerves. We then assessed three commonly used sterile gels for evidence of neurotoxicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,206,902
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#225
of 1,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,039
of 198,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.