↓ Skip to main content

A sero-survey of toxoplasmosis in farm and non-farm children from Wisconsin, United States, 1997–1999

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A sero-survey of toxoplasmosis in farm and non-farm children from Wisconsin, United States, 1997–1999
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Muñoz-Zanzi, Jessica Williams-Nguyen, Edward A Belongia

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is among the most widespread and prevalent zoonosis in the world. People can become infected through ingestion of oocysts shed by felids or of tissue cysts contained in meat from infected animals. Acute infection can result in a wide spectrum of consequences, including flu-like illness and retinitis, as well as congenital infection in pregnant women. Severe disease can occur, especially if people are immunocompromised. Frequency of human infection varies substantially by region due to ecological, social, and cultural factors. The most recent nationwide prevalence estimates in children from United States were 3.6% in 6-11 year olds and 5.8% in 12-19 year olds. Because of the limited knowledge of the occurrence of common zoonotic pathogens in children in the United States, the objective of this study was to estimate the sero-prevalence of T. gondii-specific antibodies in children from the Marshfield area in Wisconsin and to examine the association between sero-positivity and farm living.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#19,766,400
of 24,292,134 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,856
of 16,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,688
of 203,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#272
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,292,134 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.