You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
What is the empirical evidence that hospitals with higher-risk adjusted mortality rates provide poorer quality care? A systematic review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-7-91 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David W Pitches, Mohammed A Mohammed, Richard J Lilford |
Abstract |
Despite increasing interest and publication of risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates, the relationship with underlying quality of care remains unclear. We undertook a systematic review to ascertain the extent to which variations in risk-adjusted mortality rates were associated with differences in quality of care. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
Researcher | 18 | 15% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 22% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 22 | 18% |