↓ Skip to main content

Views and experiences of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners with collaborative practice in primary health care – an integrative review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Views and experiences of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners with collaborative practice in primary health care – an integrative review
Published in
BMC Primary Care, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Schadewaldt, Elizabeth McInnes, Janet E Hiller, Anne Gardner

Abstract

This integrative review synthesises research studies that have investigated the perceptions of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners working in primary health care. The aggregation of evidence on barriers and facilitators to working collaboratively and experiences about the processes of collaboration is of value to understand success factors and factors that impede collaborative working relationships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 232 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 28%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 84 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 20%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 47 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,543,016
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#297
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,547
of 209,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.