↓ Skip to main content

Review of the safety and efficacy of vitamin A supplementation in the treatment of children with severe acute malnutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of the safety and efficacy of vitamin A supplementation in the treatment of children with severe acute malnutrition
Published in
Nutrition Journal, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lora L Iannotti, Indi Trehan, Mark J Manary

Abstract

World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend for children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM), high-dose vitamin A (VA) supplements be given on day 1 of admission, and on days 2 and 14 in the case of clinical signs of vitamin A deficiency (VAD). Daily low-dose VA follows, delivered in a premix added to F-75 and F-100. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence for safety and effectiveness of high-dose VA supplementation (VAS) in treatment of children with SAM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Niger 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 23%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,518,744
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#782
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,883
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.