↓ Skip to main content

Reducing assembly complexity of microbial genomes with single-molecule sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
140 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
611 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing assembly complexity of microbial genomes with single-molecule sequencing
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergey Koren, Gregory P Harhay, Timothy PL Smith, James L Bono, Dayna M Harhay, Scott D Mcvey, Diana Radune, Nicholas H Bergman, Adam M Phillippy

Abstract

The short reads output by first- and second-generation DNA sequencing instruments cannot completely reconstruct microbial chromosomes. Therefore, most genomes have been left unfinished due to the significant resources required to manually close gaps in draft assemblies. Third-generation, single-molecule sequencing addresses this problem by greatly increasing sequencing read length, which simplifies the assembly problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 611 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 4%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 16 3%
Unknown 544 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 157 26%
Researcher 143 23%
Student > Master 69 11%
Student > Bachelor 54 9%
Other 44 7%
Other 103 17%
Unknown 41 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 308 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 121 20%
Computer Science 38 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 2%
Other 43 7%
Unknown 68 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#310,305
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#128
of 4,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,256
of 211,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.