↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomics of emerging pathogens in the Candida glabrata clade

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative genomics of emerging pathogens in the Candida glabrata clade
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toni Gabaldón, Tiphaine Martin, Marina Marcet-Houben, Pascal Durrens, Monique Bolotin-Fukuhara, Olivier Lespinet, Sylvie Arnaise, Stéphanie Boisnard, Gabriela Aguileta, Ralitsa Atanasova, Christiane Bouchier, Arnaud Couloux, Sophie Creno, Jose Almeida Cruz, Hugo Devillers, Adela Enache-Angoulvant, Juliette Guitard, Laure Jaouen, Laurence Ma, Christian Marck, Cécile Neuvéglise, Eric Pelletier, Amélie Pinard, Julie Poulain, Julien Recoquillay, Eric Westhof, Patrick Wincker, Bernard Dujon, Christophe Hennequin, Cécile Fairhead

Abstract

Candida glabrata follows C. albicans as the second or third most prevalent cause of candidemia worldwide. These two pathogenic yeasts are distantly related, C. glabrata being part of the Nakaseomyces, a group more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although C. glabrata was thought to be the only pathogenic Nakaseomyces, two new pathogens have recently been described within this group: C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis. To gain insight into the genomic changes underlying the emergence of virulence, we sequenced the genomes of these two, and three other non-pathogenic Nakaseomyces, and compared them to other sequenced yeasts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 198 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 23%
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 38 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,372,943
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,408
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,813
of 210,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#38
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.