↓ Skip to main content

Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
578 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1866-1955-5-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Wang, Jamie Barstein, Lauren E Ethridge, Matthew W Mosconi, Yukari Takarae, John A Sweeney

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a group of complex and heterogeneous developmental disorders involving multiple neural system dysfunctions. In an effort to understand neurophysiological substrates, identify etiopathophysiologically distinct subgroups of patients, and track outcomes of novel treatments with translational biomarkers, EEG (electroencephalography) studies offer a promising research strategy in ASD. Resting-state EEG studies of ASD suggest a U-shaped profile of electrophysiological power alterations, with excessive power in low-frequency and high-frequency bands, abnormal functional connectivity, and enhanced power in the left hemisphere of the brain. In this review, we provide a summary of recent findings, discuss limitations in available research that may contribute to inconsistencies in the literature, and offer suggestions for future research in this area for advancing the understanding of ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 578 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 562 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 21%
Researcher 88 15%
Student > Master 70 12%
Student > Bachelor 65 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 84 15%
Unknown 117 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 130 22%
Neuroscience 108 19%
Engineering 47 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 7%
Other 72 12%
Unknown 141 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,155,764
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#76
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,602
of 199,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.