↓ Skip to main content

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 1,935)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4309 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5253 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola K Gale, Gemma Heath, Elaine Cameron, Sabina Rashid, Sabi Redwood

Abstract

The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 42 <1%
United States 9 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Malaysia 5 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Other 26 <1%
Unknown 5154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1104 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 983 19%
Researcher 642 12%
Student > Bachelor 385 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 299 6%
Other 970 18%
Unknown 870 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1083 21%
Social Sciences 817 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 626 12%
Psychology 418 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 196 4%
Other 1001 19%
Unknown 1112 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#476,900
of 21,807,934 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#40
of 1,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,109
of 183,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,807,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them