↓ Skip to main content

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 2,293)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
50 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6367 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola K Gale, Gemma Heath, Elaine Cameron, Sabina Rashid, Sabi Redwood

Abstract

The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6,367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 42 <1%
United States 9 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Malaysia 5 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 25 <1%
Unknown 6269 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1189 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1092 17%
Researcher 755 12%
Student > Bachelor 420 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 342 5%
Other 1098 17%
Unknown 1471 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1171 18%
Social Sciences 896 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 710 11%
Psychology 467 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 225 4%
Other 1152 18%
Unknown 1746 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#526,664
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#40
of 2,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,105
of 213,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.