↓ Skip to main content

Full “Laplacianised” posterior naive Bayesian algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Full “Laplacianised” posterior naive Bayesian algorithm
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-5-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamse Y Mussa, John BO Mitchell, Robert C Glen

Abstract

In the last decade the standard Naive Bayes (SNB) algorithm has been widely employed in multi-class classification problems in cheminformatics. This popularity is mainly due to the fact that the algorithm is simple to implement and in many cases yields respectable classification results. Using clever heuristic arguments "anchored" by insightful cheminformatics knowledge, Xia et al. have simplified the SNB algorithm further and termed it the Laplacian Corrected Modified Naive Bayes (LCMNB) approach, which has been widely used in cheminformatics since its publication.In this note we mathematically illustrate the conditions under which Xia et al.'s simplification holds. It is our hope that this clarification could help Naive Bayes practitioners in deciding when it is appropriate to employ the LCMNB algorithm to classify large chemical datasets.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Researcher 6 19%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 26%
Computer Science 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Engineering 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%