↓ Skip to main content

Web Apollo: a web-based genomic annotation editing platform

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Web Apollo: a web-based genomic annotation editing platform
Published in
Genome Biology, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Lee, Gregg A Helt, Justin T Reese, Monica C Munoz-Torres, Chris P Childers, Robert M Buels, Lincoln Stein, Ian H Holmes, Christine G Elsik, Suzanna E Lewis

Abstract

Web Apollo is the first instantaneous, collaborative genomic annotation editor available on the web. One of the natural consequences following from current advances in sequencing technology is that there are more and more researchers sequencing new genomes. These researchers require tools to describe the functional features of their newly sequenced genomes. With Web Apollo researchers can use any of the common browsers (for example, Chrome or Firefox) to jointly analyze and precisely describe the features of a genome in real time, whether they are in the same room or working from opposite sides of the world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Germany 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 259 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 22%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 22%
Computer Science 13 5%
Engineering 6 2%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 33 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,228,996
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,640
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,940
of 211,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#26
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.