You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do resting brain dynamics predict oddball evoked-potential?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-12-121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tien-Wen Lee, Younger W-Y Yu, Hung-Chi Wu, Tai-Jui Chen |
| Abstract |
The oddball paradigm is widely applied to the investigation of cognitive function in neuroscience and in neuropsychiatry. Whether cortical oscillation in the resting state can predict the elicited oddball event-related potential (ERP) is still not clear. This study explored the relationship between resting electroencephalography (EEG) and oddball ERPs. The regional powers of 18 electrodes across delta, theta, alpha and beta frequencies were correlated with the amplitude and latency of N1, P2, N2 and P3 components of oddball ERPs. A multivariate analysis based on partial least squares (PLS) was applied to further examine the spatial pattern revealed by multiple correlations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2011.
All research outputs
#19,631,015
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#905
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,923
of 246,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.