↓ Skip to main content

Activated platelet-rich plasma improves adipose-derived stem cell transplantation efficiency in injured articular cartilage

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activated platelet-rich plasma improves adipose-derived stem cell transplantation efficiency in injured articular cartilage
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/scrt277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phuc Van Pham, Khanh Hong-Thien Bui, Dat Quoc Ngo, Ngoc Bich Vu, Nhung Hai Truong, Nhan Lu-Chinh Phan, Dung Minh Le, Triet Dinh Duong, Thanh Duc Nguyen, Vien Tuong Le, Ngoc Kim Phan

Abstract

Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have been isolated, expanded, and applied in the treatment of many diseases. ADSCs have also been used to treat injured articular cartilage. However, there is controversy regarding the treatment efficiency. We considered that ADSC transplantation with activated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may improve injured articular cartilage compared with that of ADSC transplantation alone. In this study, we determined the role of PRP in ADSC transplantation to improve the treatment efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 140 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Engineering 7 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,710,475
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#644
of 2,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,940
of 198,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.