You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary management of childhood diarrhea in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-s3-s17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle F Gaffey, Kerri Wazny, Diego G Bassani, Zulfiqar A Bhutta |
| Abstract |
Current WHO guidelines on the management and treatment of diarrhea in children strongly recommend continued feeding alongside the administration of oral rehydration solution and zinc therapy, but there remains some debate regarding the optimal diet or dietary ingredients for feeding children with diarrhea. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 60 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,177,097
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,285
of 14,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,750
of 201,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#214
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.