↓ Skip to main content

Platelet-rich plasma preparation for regenerative medicine: optimization and quantification of cytokines and growth factors

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
497 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Platelet-rich plasma preparation for regenerative medicine: optimization and quantification of cytokines and growth factors
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/scrt218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Romina Amable, Rosana Bizon Vieira Carias, Marcus Vinicius Telles Teixeira, Ítalo da Cruz Pacheco, Ronaldo José Farias Corrêa do Amaral, José Mauro Granjeiro, Radovan Borojevic

Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is nowadays widely applied in different clinical scenarios, such as orthopedics, ophthalmology and healing therapies, as a growth factor pool for improving tissue regeneration. Studies into its clinical efficiency are not conclusive and one of the main reasons for this is that different PRP preparations are used, eliciting different responses that cannot be compared. Platelet quantification and the growth factor content definition must be defined in order to understand molecular mechanisms behind PRP regenerative strength. Standardization of PRP preparations is thus urgently needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 518 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 77 14%
Student > Master 65 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 11%
Student > Bachelor 50 9%
Student > Postgraduate 46 9%
Other 120 23%
Unknown 114 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 186 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 3%
Engineering 15 3%
Other 69 13%
Unknown 138 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,639,530
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#81
of 2,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,303
of 199,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.