You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of vaporized nanoemulsions on ultrasound-mediated ablation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2050-5736-1-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peng Zhang, Jonathan A Kopechek, Tyrone M Porter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 29% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 25% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2013.
All research outputs
#3,770,267
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#13
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,395
of 194,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them