↓ Skip to main content

Intraspecific variation of recombination rate in maize

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
patent
3 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraspecific variation of recombination rate in maize
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Bauer, Matthieu Falque, Hildrun Walter, Cyril Bauland, Christian Camisan, Laura Campo, Nina Meyer, Nicolas Ranc, Renaud Rincent, Wolfgang Schipprack, Thomas Altmann, Pascal Flament, Albrecht E Melchinger, Monica Menz, Jesús Moreno-González, Milena Ouzunova, Pedro Revilla, Alain Charcosset, Olivier C Martin, Chris-Carolin Schön

Abstract

In sexually reproducing organisms, meiotic crossovers ensure the proper segregation of chromosomes and contribute to genetic diversity by shuffling allelic combinations. Such genetic reassortment is exploited in breeding to combine favorable alleles, and in genetic research to identify genetic factors underlying traits of interest via linkage or association-based approaches. Crossover numbers and distributions along chromosomes vary between species, but little is known about their intraspecies variation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 3 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 186 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 28%
Researcher 54 27%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Professor 11 6%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 12%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 32 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,721,000
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,124
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,591
of 213,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.