↓ Skip to main content

Ecological status and traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary of Garhwal Himalaya, India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
363 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological status and traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary of Garhwal Himalaya, India
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jahangeer A Bhat, Munesh Kumar, Rainer W Bussmann

Abstract

Himalayan forests are the most important source of medicinal plants and with useful species for the local people. Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary (KWLS) is situated in the interior part of the Garhwal Himalayan region. The presented study was carried out in Madhmeshwar area of KWLS for the ecological status of medicinal plants and further focused on the ethnomedicinal uses of these plants in the study area.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 23%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 11 5%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 30%
Environmental Science 31 13%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Chemistry 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 77 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,251,864
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#109
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,896
of 280,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.