↓ Skip to main content

Postprandial effect of dietary fat quantity and quality on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postprandial effect of dietary fat quantity and quality on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona E Lithander, Louise K Herlihy, Deirdre M Walsh, Emma Burke, Vivion Crowley, Azra Mahmud

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is a component of vascular function and an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease. There is a lack of conclusive evidence on the effect of a meal rich in monounsaturated fat (MUFA) compared with an isoenergetic meal rich in saturated fat (SFA) on postprandial vascular function and specifically on arterial stiffness.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 37%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 23 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,612,456
of 19,152,115 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#559
of 1,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,876
of 179,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,152,115 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them