You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Postprandial effect of dietary fat quantity and quality on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-93 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona E Lithander, Louise K Herlihy, Deirdre M Walsh, Emma Burke, Vivion Crowley, Azra Mahmud |
| Abstract |
Arterial stiffness is a component of vascular function and an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease. There is a lack of conclusive evidence on the effect of a meal rich in monounsaturated fat (MUFA) compared with an isoenergetic meal rich in saturated fat (SFA) on postprandial vascular function and specifically on arterial stiffness. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,170,617
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#633
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,189
of 194,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#21
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.