↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between Body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage, estimated by bioelectrical impedance, in a group of Sri Lankan adults: a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between Body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage, estimated by bioelectrical impedance, in a group of Sri Lankan adults: a cross sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chathuranga Ranasinghe, Prasanna Gamage, Prasad Katulanda, Nalinda Andraweera, Sithira Thilakarathne, Praveen Tharanga

Abstract

Body Mass Index (BMI) is used as a useful population-level measure of overweight and obesity. It is used as the same for both sexes and for all ages of adults. The relationship between BMI and body fat percentage (BF %) has been studied in various ethnic groups to estimate the capacity of BMI to predict adiposity. We aimed to study the BMI-BF% relationship, in a group of South Asian adults who have a different body composition compared to presently studied ethnic groups. We examined the influence of age, gender in this relationship and assessed its' linearity or curvilinearity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 449 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 113 25%
Student > Master 63 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 6%
Researcher 24 5%
Student > Postgraduate 24 5%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 140 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 5%
Sports and Recreations 16 4%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 149 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,210,437
of 25,058,660 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,811
of 16,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,747
of 203,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#72
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,058,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.