You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of oral adenosine-5′-triphosphate supplementation on athletic performance, skeletal muscle hypertrophy and recovery in resistance-trained men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-7075-10-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob M Wilson, Jordan M Joy, Ryan P Lowery, Michael D Roberts, Christopher M Lockwood, Anssi H Manninen, John C Fuller, Eduardo O De Souza, Shawn M Baier, Stephanie MC Wilson, John A Rathmacher |
| Abstract |
Currently, there is a lack of studies examining the effects of adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) supplementation utilizing a long-term, periodized resistance-training program (RT) in resistance-trained populations. Therefore, we investigated the effects of 12 weeks of 400 mg per day of oral ATP on muscular adaptations in trained individuals. We also sought to determine the effects of ATP on muscle protein breakdown, cortisol, and performance during an overreaching cycle. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 17% |
| United States | 12 | 15% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 62% |
| Scientists | 20 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#219,727
of 25,204,049 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#39
of 1,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,531
of 209,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.