↓ Skip to main content

Seroprevalence and risk factors of toxoplasmosis in cattle from extensive and semi-intensive rearing systems at Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais state, Southern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seroprevalence and risk factors of toxoplasmosis in cattle from extensive and semi-intensive rearing systems at Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais state, Southern Brazil
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo Vieira Fajardo, Sthefane D’ávila, Ronaldo Rocha Bastos, Carolina Dutra Cyrino, Michelle de Lima Detoni, João Luis Garcia, Leandro Batista das Neves, José Leonardo Nicolau, Maria Regina Reis Amendoeira

Abstract

Concerning the infection of humans by T. gondii, limited efforts have been directed to the elucidation of the role of horizontal transmission between hosts. One of the main routes of transmission from animals to humans occurs through the ingestion of raw or insufficiently cooked meat. However, even though the detection of T. gondii in meat constitutes an important short-term measure, control strategies can only be accomplished by a deeper understanding of the epidemiology of toxoplasmosis. The present study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in cattle from Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais, Brazil, and to identify associated risk factors, through an epidemiological investigation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,635,727
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,030
of 5,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,344
of 196,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#13
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.