You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ciliogenesis and cerebrospinal fluid flow in the developing Xenopus brain are regulated by foxj1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cilia, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-2530-2-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathrin Hagenlocher, Peter Walentek, Christina Müller, Thomas Thumberger, Kerstin Feistel |
| Abstract |
Circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the ventricular system is driven by motile cilia on ependymal cells of the brain. Disturbed ciliary motility induces the formation of hydrocephalus, a pathological accumulation of CSF resulting in ventricle dilatation and increased intracranial pressure. The mechanism by which loss of motile cilia causes hydrocephalus has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was: (1) to provide a detailed account of the development of ciliation in the brain of the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis; and (2) to analyze the relevance of ependymal cilia motility for CSF circulation and brain ventricle morphogenesis in Xenopus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 17% |
| Germany | 7 | 12% |
| United States | 7 | 12% |
| France | 5 | 8% |
| Japan | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 59% |
| Scientists | 23 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,162,382
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Cilia
#3
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,136
of 215,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cilia
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them